The hostile takeover of US showed centralized leadership weakny. You take a spot and you rule the administration.
EU is fragmented and even if you take the role of Ursula you can't rule the Europe.
You have to take each country one by one.
The hardest to take over are monarchies: UK,Spain, Belgium Netherlands, Denmark,Sweden, Norway.
The second hardest are the Russia's neighbors that are not orthodox: Finland, Estonia, Letonia, Lituania,Poland.
Russia tried and failed to take over France via FN and Germany via Schröder, but these countries have their own powerful elites to block Moscow interest.
Except Czech republic, Slovakia and Hungary fell under Russian spell, they don't have the resources to resist alone, they don't have their own elites to be independent.
Maybe the crush of the Prague spring in '68, keeps Czech far from Russia.
Romania is more complicated.
There are elites that are pro Russian or anti western, and Russians leverage the influence of orthodoxy, but the hatred and fear of Russia in Romania is compared only with that of Poland.
Romania is pull rope between Russia, Europe and US now.
Their weakness is that they bet everything on US.
They bet everything on France and Britain in '30.
Bulgaria had string ties with Soviet Union, it is a Slavic and orthodox county it could be influenced easily.
Greece is an Orthodox country, had good relations with Russia in past, Russia had supported the Greek independence early.
Italy is more complicated they might use personal ties with Moscow for their own benefit. And the country is divided.
So Russia can't take over all EU by supporting its own candidates in the elections.
But it can block any initiative that requires consensus.
I think any decisions should be taken with 2/3 majority, to isolate countries like Hungary that supports Putin
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu