More details you know,less you are informed

Two things happened Wednesday 18 ianuary 2017 in Bucharest.
The president Klaus Johaniss has presided a government session in the morning and in the afternoon it was a demonstration against the planed pardon of 4000 convicts for corruption.
In that day the government led by Prime Minister Sorin Grindeanu should have proposed 2 ordinances that should modify the penal code and pardon the deeds of corruption and bad public management.
Luckily the President intervened, in time and according to article 87 from Romanian Constitution he presided the government session, and blocked in this way the adoption of the ordinances.
What was on the TVR state television?
It was a talkshow in which some "journalists" discussed minute by minute what happened in that morning. What the president has done at 9.05? But what he did at 9.06?The prime minister was announced or not ? The president should have announced with an hour before or not? The protection service of the president informed the prime minster about it?
The "journalist" Ion Cristoiu was wondering why the president didn't announced with 24h before that he will participate?He didn't bothered to read the constitution to know that the president it is not obliged to ask permission to participate at government meetings regarding national security.
In short it was discussed every detail, but not the main problem: that government wanted to free some felons and that the people are in the street.

Post scriptum:
Now the famous Bamboo club owned by Castelano family burned down, a it can be reason for televisions to avoid again discussions about the pardon of the felons.
Or maybe it will trigger a movement like the one after the burn of the Colectiv club in November last year.
It seems that in order to persuade the Romanian youth to participate in politics you have to burn down their clubs.

Republica Bananiera Romana

In campania electorala trecuta am auzit deseori argumentul ca Transilvania este mai bogata deoarece a votat cu dreapta (PNL,PD,PNT).
Cunoscand incompetenta politicienilor romania as zice ca e invers: Transilvania bogata a votat cu dreapta.
Sa ma explic:
Dupa revolutie economia a fost capusata de catre fostele cadre din PCR si din Securitate.
Dar nu toate judetele au fost egale in privinta sanselor de dezvotare economica.
Sa comparam Botosaniul cu Timisoara.
Cei din Botosani nu se puteau duce in URSS sa faca trafic cu marfuri, dar cei din Timisoara se duceau in mod frecvent la sarbi si unguri sa cumpere marfa ce nu se gasea in Romania. Acest lucru a dus la acumulare privata de capital.
Pentru a avea un partid, trebuie bani pentru a plati oameni care sa organizeze campaniile si sa cumpere mass media.
Transilvania datorita avansului economic a putut avea mai multi oameni care sa se lanseze in politica, iar votul acolo a fost mai divers.(Nu a fost niciodata 100% dreapta dar votul a fost mai diversificat)
In Moldova si Muntenia dependenta de economia statului a creat un monopol politic al FSN,PDSR,PSD din lipsa de concurenti.
In Europa acumularea de capital din orase a dus la aparitia burgheziei, si a parlamentarismului si dezvoltarea democratiei.
In Africa concentrarea bogatiilor in mainile colonistilor si mai tarziu a guvernelor indigene, a dus la o saracire mai accentuata a populatiei, pentru ca o populatie saraca care traieste de pe azi pe maine, nu va cere drepturi politice si va fi mai usor de controlat. Rezultatul a fost tipica dictatura africana.
La noi se incearca implementarea aceluiasi model african, prin care doare cei conectati si putin sa aiba acces la resurse, in timp ce restul populatiei sa lucreze pe bani putini sau sa emigreze.

Types of inventions

There are 3 types of inventions:

1. Inventions that prolong our lifes: medicines, seat belt, armour vest etc
2.Inventions that help us to use time more efficient: transportation means (car,train,plane) computers, internet, mobile phones
3. Inventions that shorten our life: guns, drugs, different chemicals.

An invention can be in 2 categories:
For example a drug can be used as a medicine or as a poison, a car can help us use our time more efficient, but in same time making us sick.

It is rational to use a car for saving 1h of driving to work even we die 1 year earlier because of exhaust gases?

Qui prodest?

When you study history don't bother to search for causes because history is a collection of unwanted results.
The French revolution was started by the Louis XVI cousin, who wanted power.
The Russian revolution was supported by Russian nobility and bourgeois.
The Iranian Islamic revolution started because USA supported the shah.
And the list can go on and on.
Instead we must focus to on who profits? Qui prodest?

Yesterday we had 3 events:

1. Shooting of Russian ambassador to Ankara
2.Attack in Berlin with a truck
3.Shootings in a Islamic Center in Zurich

1. Shooting of Russian ambassador to Ankara
This benefits the enemies of Erdogan, from the interior and exterior. Erdogan it is seems to be a weak leader, unable to control the army and the police. Maybe the attack won't create a wedge between Russia and Turkey,but maybe Putin will consider other options than Erdogan.
The attacker was killed.

2.The attack in Berlin weakens the position of Merkel before elections, increases the hostility of German population towards the refugees from Middle East.
Very unlikely that German will meddle in Middle East by supporting anti-Assad opposition.
The attacker is still at large.

3. The shooting in Zurich could create hostility between Islamic world and Switzerland.
In Switzerland exists strong xenophobic movements, that can be provoked.
Interesting that the killer was a swiss of ghanese origin who was found later dead.

Whom has watched Macbeth can suppose that the killers were some tools that were disposed afterwards.

In case 2 and 3 the Russia profits, in case 1 Erdogan  and Russia's enemies .

Why Donald Trump faults were ignored

I listen the following blog https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPancE2dNsQ
which tries to understand why despite his faults Donald Trump has won.
The explanation is simple: when you wear a clean shirt, every spot is seen, when you wear a rag, the dirt is ignored.
If Obama would done the 10% of Donald Trump mistakes, he would be impeached.
But Trump has done so many outrageous things that 1 or 2 doesn't matter.

Movie review: Inferno

Dan Brown earns money by making sacrileges and blasphemies. First he earned money on Christianity, when he wrote "The Da Vinci code", a book in which professor Langdon discovers a conspiracy that tries to hide the fact that Jesus Christ had a child with Mary Magdalene.
In book  "Angels and demons" a new conspiracy within Catholic Church brings a lot of cash for Dan Brown.
In "Inferno" the sacrilege is more secular: the desire of a elite to play the god.
The Italian cathedrals are used only as scenery, while professor Langdon is trying to foil a plot in which a billionaire is trying to trim the human population by 50%.
The director Ron Howard, has made the characters more deep, the "villains" are some smart people that want to save the world using an inhuman solution.The images of Langdon having hallucinations regarding the inferno are very creative and disgusting.
But as in other Dan Brown's book there are holes in the story.
If in the "Angels and demons" it was the antimatter. (It is very expensive and it is very hard to transport), in "Inferno" the biggest hole is the production of a deadly virus.
In order to produce a virus you need a lab, with specialists in microbiology and they will know what you try to do, and they will try to stop you and disclose the informations or they will try to protect their families by giving them a vaccine, which will rise questions.
Also the virus must be tested, on humans, this will increase the mortality rate of some population, and draw attention of medical authorities.
Zobrist the bad guy from "Inferno" would have a hard time to produce a virus without raising suspicions.
It would be simpler for him to buy some TV stations,news papers and some websites and promote via these media outlets that the vaccines are bad.
The simpletons would believe this they will not take their vaccine shots, and some different epidemics would  wipe them.
And the beauty of the plan is that he and his family would be alive because they are protected by common vaccines, and even if the plot would be discovered, he could be accused only of misinformation.

How to get sex when you are old

There is tonne of literature and the internet is full of advices about how to get layed. But it seems that the best method is to became a cult leader. Like this 61 years old guy from Targu Mures Romania who pretended to be in connection with Jesus (Cehov1 as he said it).
The story is old, it happened before with Guru Bivolaru, Jim Jones and other cults leaders
 and with same methods:
A nut or a crook in the best case, convince some people that he is "The chosen One" that he is in contact with Jesus,God or aliens and it has special powers.(In this case he convinced a women and her daughter.)
These people are influenced and isolated then they are sent to recruit other vulnerable persons. Like in our case some young female students from an art school.
They are isolated in a house, and required to do all kind of strange rituals that strengthen the cohesion of the group and help brainwash you.
(If you made dumb rituals like praying at midnight then you have made sex with the guru, you don't question your adherence to the group because you will realise that you were stupid.)

Isolated with a like minded group it is harder and harder to refuse requests from the cult leader.
Today he is requesting a small donation, tomorrow he will request to borrow money from bank and donate to the cult.
Today the cult leader will request a hug tomorrow he will request to make sex with him.
What pisses me off is that these tricks are old, and still people don't learn from it,even if the people are intelligent.
It seems that the cults prefer sane and intelligent people, to exploiting them.
An homeless schizophrenic person it is useless and even worse, it can be a threat for the leader, because its delusions can be a stronger than leader's.
Also a psychotic person is less manipulated by group.
In conclusion the leader of the group can be psychotic but its member they are not, they are just sheeps.

Here is a good link to cult psyhology: http://workingpsychology.com/cult.html